<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gem #44: Accessibility Checks (Part III)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adacore.com/2008/09/15/gem-44/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adacore.com/2008/09/15/gem-44/</link>
	<description>AdaCore technology and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:59:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Duff</title>
		<link>http://www.adacore.com/2008/09/15/gem-44/comment-page-1/#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Duff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.adacore.com/?p=2354#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>&gt; Is it guaranteed that Finalize will be called in the reverse order of
&gt; Initialize? If multiple objects were created in the same scope, would the
&gt; Assert be guaranteed to always pass?

Yes, and yes.

- Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Is it guaranteed that Finalize will be called in the reverse order of<br />
&gt; Initialize? If multiple objects were created in the same scope, would the<br />
&gt; Assert be guaranteed to always pass?</p>
<p>Yes, and yes.</p>
<p>- Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Fairlamb</title>
		<link>http://www.adacore.com/2008/09/15/gem-44/comment-page-1/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Fairlamb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.adacore.com/?p=2354#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll let colleagues respond to the first part of your question, Brian. 

Regarding your suggestion to associate a date with each gem, we purposely don&#039;t date the gems, as they are not supposed to represent any kind of progressive Ada course but rather a collection of interesting hints, presented in no particular order. You are not, therefore, &quot;behind&quot; :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll let colleagues respond to the first part of your question, Brian. </p>
<p>Regarding your suggestion to associate a date with each gem, we purposely don&#8217;t date the gems, as they are not supposed to represent any kind of progressive Ada course but rather a collection of interesting hints, presented in no particular order. You are not, therefore, &#8220;behind&#8221; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.adacore.com/2008/09/15/gem-44/comment-page-1/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www2.adacore.com/?p=2354#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>Is it guaranteed that Finalize will be called in the reverse order of Initialize?  If multiple objects were created in the same scope, would the Assert be guaranteed to always pass?

-- Also, since these are Weekly Gems, would it be possible to show an associated date with each one?  That way I&#039;d know how far behind I am (apparently, at least 5 weeks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it guaranteed that Finalize will be called in the reverse order of Initialize?  If multiple objects were created in the same scope, would the Assert be guaranteed to always pass?</p>
<p>&#8211; Also, since these are Weekly Gems, would it be possible to show an associated date with each one?  That way I&#8217;d know how far behind I am (apparently, at least 5 weeks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

