Comments on: Gem #27: Changing Data Representation (Part 1) http://www.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/ AdaCore technology and news Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:59:19 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Peter Hermann http://www.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/comment-page-1/#comment-1437 Peter Hermann Wed, 07 May 2008 11:47:17 +0000 http://www2.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/#comment-1437 reliability of underground marshalling is a hope of deliverance (Paul McCartney) :-) reliability of underground marshalling is a
hope of deliverance (Paul McCartney) :-)

]]> By: Anders Eriksson http://www.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/comment-page-1/#comment-1244 Anders Eriksson Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:48:28 +0000 http://www2.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/#comment-1244 I love when the compiler doing my works! When even more speed needed you can turn off the runtime check activate it explicitly with the attribute 'Valid on each separate subtyped component you want checked. This approch is specially usefull when checking in/out coming messages in an embedded application. I love when the compiler doing my works!
When even more speed needed you can turn off the runtime check activate it explicitly with the attribute ‘Valid on each separate subtyped component you want checked. This approch is specially usefull when checking in/out coming messages in an embedded application.

]]> By: Peter Hermann http://www.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/comment-page-1/#comment-1146 Peter Hermann Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:12:47 +0000 http://www2.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/#comment-1146 Inspiring! Concise, optimal description. A real gem. Inspiring! Concise, optimal description. A real gem.

]]> By: Wes http://www.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/comment-page-1/#comment-1137 Wes Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:35:41 +0000 http://www2.adacore.com/2008/03/03/gem-27/#comment-1137 Interesting! I never knew you could map an enumeration to a different set of values. I always created a separate look-up table with the source enumeration as an index into it. Thanks for the gem! Interesting! I never knew you could map an enumeration to a different set of values. I always created a separate look-up table with the source enumeration as an index into it. Thanks for the gem!

]]>